My Account  |  RSS  
Wednesday, March 17, 2010    

Search  


Pakistan's obsession over parity with India

Font size:

Toronto, ON, Canada, — India, with its 1.1 billion population, US$1.2 trillion economy – equivalent to US$3.5 trillion in purchasing power parity – and US$28 billion in annual defense expenditures, can afford to do a lot more in economic, political and military terms than Pakistan, with its 175 million population, US$445 billion PPP economy and US$8 billion in annual defense expenditures. There is also US$2 billion in annual aid provided by the United States.

Yet Pakistan never ceases to seek parity with India in all spheres.

Pakistan’s call for parity with India has brought it good results with a benevolent United States. From 1954 to 1964, the United States fulfilled every Pakistani demand for arms in a vain effort to contain the former Soviet Union. From 1979 to 1987, when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, Pakistan not only managed to equal India’s military strength but also stole nuclear weapons secrets, which went largely unchecked.

Pakistan’s unequivocal quest for arms came to a sudden end when U.S. Senator Larry Pressler checked it against a law that prohibited arms export to Pakistan. This happened because the U.S. government obtained conclusive evidence that Pakistan had completed building a uranium enrichment facility and was exporting nuclear technology.

But the ban on arms shipments lasted only 10 years. After the 9/11 terror attacks, Pakistan was back in the good books of the United States. With Pressler’s amendment repealed, Pakistan was again pampered with U.S. arms as well as missile technology and arms from China.

In the past 10 years, about US$9 billion worth of “aid” has flowed into Pakistan. Much of it was used to buy arms from countries like Ukraine, Sweden, France and China, and not from the United States, to safeguard against any new Pressler-type amendment that would restrict arms purchases.

The Afghanistan war will continue for another decade or so in some form or other, until both parties get tired of rising deaths. This also means that U.S. arms will continue to flow into Pakistan. Under the pretext of fighting the Taliban and with U.S. money, Pakistan is procuring much sophisticated hardware like the latest F-16 fighters, night-vision equipped Russian-made Ukrainian tanks, as well as slightly inferior AWACS planes from Sweden, diesel submarines from France, technologically antiquated Chinese fighters and clandestine missiles from China and North Korea.

The reason for all this is Pakistan’s obsession for parity with India.

India is not sitting idle either. It is using its own money rather than foreign “aid” to buy a sophisticated array of arms from the United States, Israel, France, Russia and Britain. About US$25 billion worth of arms have already arrived in India in the past 10 years. Another US$55 billion are in various stages of procurement over the next five to seven years. In addition, it has its own locally manufactured military hardware. India can afford the expenditure because it has a strong economy to match its military hardware-purchasing spree.

What will the state of affairs in India and Pakistan be in 10 years time? By 2020, India will have tripled its economy to US$3.5 trillion – US$10 trillion in PPP. Its defense budget will also have tripled to US$90 billion. In comparison, Pakistan will still be mired in the U.S.-sponsored war in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, and most likely another war of its own making in Baluchistan. Its perpetual troublemaking in Kashmir will continue as usual.

It is also possible that Pakistan’s conflict with Iran could escalate if religious crazed zealots in Pakistan make life for the Shiite population in the country miserable. So trouble is unlikely to end for Pakistan any time soon.

That does not mean that India will be free from trouble. Pakistan-sponsored terrorism in Kashmir and other urban centers will continue. Also, Pakistan will cosponsor trouble in the northeast in addition to a belligerent China already looking to cause trouble in the region.

Pakistan’s defense budget is also likely to remain at US$30 billion. Its economy will remain in bad shape until the army’s agenda of fighting India is dumped.

Why there is this uncanny desire in Pakistan for parity with India? One reason is internal politics. In the past 60 years, Pakistani leaders have misled their population into believing that Muslims will rule once again from New Delhi and that one Pakistani soldier is equal to 30 Indian soldiers. But past experience – in Pakistan’s surrender in Dhaka in 1971, its eviction from Kargil in 1999 and its inability to capture Siachen Glacier from India – proves this wrong.

Pakistan will not match India even if U.S. aid continues at the current level or even increases a bit. Much of its energy will be directed to contain trouble internally. In addition, its military, politics and economy, as long as they are Punjab-dominated, are a recipe for trouble.

When India signed the Indo-U.S. civil nuclear deal, Pakistan also wanted the same deal as parity. It had to be reminded that it was Pakistan who proliferated nuclear technology to North Korea, Iran, Libya and many other places. Under the circumstances, the United States flatly rejected any conversation on parity in civil nuclear matters.

In the past three years, Pakistan has implemented its own parity with India. When India had its first Israeli AWACs delivered last year, Pakistan arranged the delivery of a much inferior AWAC from Sweden.

India has been flying Israeli-made surveillance drones for the past eight years. Pakistan wanted the same, but nobody was willing to sell them to them. So it arm-twisted the United States into supplying 14 unarmed versions this year under the pretext of fighting the Taliban.

Also, when India contracted with France to build diesel submarines, Pakistan timed the delivery of its diesel submarines, again from France, ahead of deliveries to India.

There is no end to Pakistan’s obsession with parity with India. Indian-made LCA fighter jets will be delivered to the air force in about two years. But Pakistan had its version of the fighter made and delivered from China two years ahead of India’s delivery.

If India tests a home-built missile, Pakistan goes out of its way to sell its soul for a similar one from North Korea or China, even before the Indian version is fully operational. The Pakistani “Babur” cruise missile is an example.

One has to note that hurriedly procured missiles from North Korea and China are not in the same class as those developed by India with Israeli and Russian assistance. But Pakistan always claims huge successes and correspondents from the British Jane’s Weekly are always in attendance to write admiring reviews.

This parity obsession is costing Pakistanis a bundle. But they do not mind. They do not mind starving their population into eating grass as long as they get their nuclear weapons, missiles, fighter jets, AWACs and submarines.

China and the United States have been using Pakistan from time to time for their own agendas and will continue to do so, as the country’s obsession with getting more arms for parity makes it easy to manipulate Pakistan.

--

(Hari Sud is a retired vice president of C-I-L Inc., a former investment strategies analyst and international relations manager. A graduate of Punjab University and the University of Missouri, he has lived in Canada for the past 34 years. ©Copyright Hari Sud.)



[ Flag ]
slope @ February 10, 2010 11:21PM HKT
harisucker says: "I just get a kick out of comparing China with India". I guess you feel glorified when there is a comparison between your ancestral pakiland and India. pakiland's only hope for survival is thru terrorism. shattered economy, communal riots, daily suicide bombings. half of pakiland's gdp comes from the donations from the western and islamic terrorist world. military muscles "donated" by commie china. I am sure you get a "pathetic kick" when comparing pakistan with any country not just India.
madeline albright said " all roads of terrorism lead to Pakiland" (she stopped short of saying china though)

[ Flag ]
harisuck @ February 10, 2010 02:43PM HKT
Chinese economy would burst if it does not have a domestic market. But its domestic market is growing at a fast pace and its now the 2nd largest in the world. China is also the world's largest auto market.

I just get a kick out of comparing China with India as there is no comparason. India is more like Mexico and Peru in terms of capability and potential

[ Flag ]
gunasekar @ February 9, 2010 03:42PM HKT
schwzik @ February 4, 2010 02:47AM HKT
A very balanced view has been expressed here.
it is only time that the bubble breaks...I am used to seeing large building projects, with no occupants and literally no work going on in and around beijing and north east china areas. Now i can see some work under progress but still no buyers, no one moving in those new houses. Contrarily in India, the real estate has been on the move always. In China many factories making christmas goods pulled shutters and company owners fled to Taiwan, no such news were heard in India. Perhaps Louii can explain, whats wrong here, and also can explain why Chinamen cannot sing the song they wish to sing at KTV bars!!!

[ Flag ]
gunasekar @ February 9, 2010 03:38PM HKT
harisuck,

since u said you are not a moslem and chinese and living in the usa, why you always speak on behalf of china???


[ Flag ]
harisuck @ February 9, 2010 11:43AM HKT
I was reading one of Hari Sud's outrageous articles. He claimed that India has better nuclear subs and SLBM than China. I do not believe that Hari even knows whether China has nuclear weapons point to India or not.
If India has missiles that can shoot at China so Chinese threat is removed, does that mean that India was never a threat to China since the 70s as China has nuclear missiles that covered whole India since then?

[ Flag ]
sara @ February 8, 2010 04:18PM HKT
To harisud:

Hari i know thet Agni-3 will be in a Limited scale production .But my question is how many more test is required even to start this LSP for Agni-3


[ Flag ]
HariSud @ February 8, 2010 06:21AM HKT

Agni III is a demonstator for two stage solid fuel rocket system. It is intermediate range. All of China is not covered by it. A limited number will be built to keep China guessing.

No Agni IV is to built. It is the three stage Agni V, which is the ultimate goal. That if it is rail mobile will cover all of China and will permanently remove Chinese threat to India. It is unlikely that Agni V will be ready even for test flight for three years. This period will be bridged by Agni III.

Cheers


Hari Sud

[ Flag ]
sara @ February 8, 2010 12:23AM HKT
To harisud:

Hi hari ,Do you know how many more test for agni-3 is required before induction

[ Flag ]
sara @ February 8, 2010 12:23AM HKT
Hi all A very good news for india Agni-3 test is sucessful for the third time
Still some more test is required before induction and this will act as platform for the on-developing Agni-5 and the first time test of RING-LASER-GYROSCOPE was also sucessful with this missile


[ Flag ]
gunasekar @ February 6, 2010 11:09AM HKT
china lovers..... can you ppl go comment in this articles also..........it seems nobody reading it.... 'china_longs_for_a_bao_the_upright_to_uproot_corruption'

htt p://ww w.upiasia.co m/Society_Culture/2010/02/05/china_longs_for_a_bao_the_upright_to_uproot_corruption/3548/

[ Flag ]
sara @ February 5, 2010 10:17PM HKT
U are right Hari the world is using pakistan for terrorism .One recently relaeased report say that the terror activity in the world for the past 10 years has SOME links with pakistan .And pakistani's have one more problem they have an increasing population and no one is concentreating on their economy .How are they going to feed the population and there will be water shortage also .So they will keep on using terrorism a state-policy against india and prove themselves the biggest Dumbs in the world .SO LOUIS SHOULD CONCENTREATE ABOUT THIS FACTS OF HIS COUNTRY PAKISTAN









Buddhism and quantum physics
Christian Thomas Kohl

Freiburg, Germany



Where There Are Asians There Are Rice Cookers: How National Went Global via Hong Kong
by Yoshiko Nakano

Reviewed by John D. Van Fleet



Copyright © 2007-2010 United Press International, Inc.