My Account  |  RSS  
Wednesday, February 10, 2010    

Search  


India’s quest for uranium

Font size:

Toronto, ON, Canada, — Uranium, the key to nuclear power generation, is in short supply in India. The country’s reserves stand at 75,000 tons of low-grade ore, which requires processing before it becomes fuel for nuclear reactors.

This ore contains between 0.03 to 0.2 percent of triuranium octoxide, or U3O8 – an impure mixture of uranium oxides obtained in the processing of uranium ore – as U-238, which is the non-fissionable isotope found in natural uranium. International mines have anywhere from 2 to 14 percent.

Four mines in the Singhbhum district of Bihar state produce only 220 tons of uranium concentrate. In addition, 120 tons come from byproducts like tailings from phosphate, zinc and copper mines.

India’s 17 operating reactors require 500 to 600 tons of uranium concentrate annually. Additional amounts are needed for its weapons program. Two more mines in Meghalaya and Karnataka state may begin operations in the next four years, boosting output to about 600 tons. This might be enough to feed the existing nuclear reactors, but not enough for the ambitious nuclear power program the government wants to implement.

Generating 470,000 megawatts of nuclear energy by 2050, as envisaged by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, will require huge amounts of uranium. This was a key reason for India to negotiate the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal and seek a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group on the ban it faces on nuclear trade. Although the deal is settled, India still has to go through the international minefield of uranium-producing countries, which have a few hang-ups before they part with the ore.

A major initiative by India’s Department of Atomic Energy is also in progress to locate new ore bodies in India. Miners will go as deep as 1,000 meters to mine the ore. If successful, this may save India valuable time in negotiating agreements and deals with foreign suppliers.

As much as 100,000 tons of new ore is needed by India, but the chances of finding it in the country are slim. Therefore, it has to look at suppliers elsewhere.

Australia has 24 percent of the world’s known uranium reserves of 5.5 million tons. It is followed by Kazakhstan with 17 percent, Russia and Canada with 10 percent each, South Africa and the United States with 7 percent each, Namibia, Brazil and Niger with 5 percent each, and 1 percent each for India, China, Mongolia and Tajikistan. The NSG tightly controls these supplies, to restrict unauthorized trade of this vital and dangerous commodity.

Mined ore must be made into yellow cake, using sophisticated technology, with 80 percent U3O8 content. Then the yellow cake is made into pallets to be fed into the reactor core. To make nuclear weapons, uranium must be converted to gas and then diffused into the concentrated U-235 isotope.

So high-grade uranium ore is highly valued, and India has been scrambling for a year to locate and ensure its supply. Prior to the NSG’s blanket approval, India was facing a shortfall of 50 percent.

Without uranium the country’s 17 nuclear reactors were running at half capacity of 4,000 megawatts. The NSG’s timely clearance brought quick supplies from France and Russia.

India is now looking for uranium in the unexplored areas of Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Niger, Tajikistan and Namibia. Australia is not an option; it sells uranium to China, but continues to deny it to India because it has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

China has also cornered the bulk of Kazakhstan’s uranium by offering it trade and other economic incentives in the last 10 years. But India achieved a major breakthrough when Kazakh Foreign Minister Marat Tazhin visited India in January and signed a host of nuclear, space exploration and energy agreements. These agreements, including economic tie-ups, will enhance cooperation and ensure continuous uranium supplies to India. In return, India will help the Kazakhs with information technology.

In the last few months a slew of agreements with other producers like Namibia, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia and Niger have been signed to ensure future uranium supplies to India. Also, reactors built by France, Russia and the United States will supply uranium through a tripartite agreement.

Thus, uranium from Kazakhstan could end up in a reactor sold by Russia or uranium from Niger in a reactor supplied by France. The United States and Canada would supply uranium from their own sources.

Thanks to these high-powered efforts, India’s uranium supply is fairly well guaranteed. But suppliers could still hold up orders citing minor excuses so, as a precautionary measure, India needs a stockpile of three to five years’ supply.

Anticipating high demand from India and China, and with the United States possibly opening up for additional nuclear energy, the price of yellow cake shot up to US$95 in 2007. The current prices, at US$40 to $45 per pound of U3O8, are three times higher than those from 1996 to 2004. From 1994 to 2004 prices were low due to the availability of uranium from decommissioned U.S. and Russian weapons. But prices took off when these supplies ran dry.

Although India has very little uranium , it has an abundance of thorium, which is another nuclear reactor feedstock. India’s first 300-megawatt reactor using thorium is under construction, designed by the Bhabha Atomic Research Center. The process will burn mostly thorium and a bit of plutonium. If the test design is successful, it will pave the way for replacing uranium with thorium, which is four times more abundant.

Singh has envisaged a three-pronged strategy for India to generate nuclear power. Stage 1 is the current technology of pressurized heavy-water reactors, which are under construction or on order.

Stage 2 will introduce fast breeder reactors that use plutonium from stage 1 and thorium in the reactor core. By 2020 India may be building more stage 2 reactors of indigenous design than the current heavy-water reactors.

Stage 3 is the most ambitious. It will use U-233 from stage 2 and thorium. If India perfects the thorium – U-233 core design and a matching reactor, it will achieve a major technological breakthrough. Construction of this type of reactors is 20 years away.

So India needs the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal for stage 1 nuclear power generation, after which it will be self-sufficient. It may still import specialized equipment that falls under the purview of the deal as well as NSG review, but it will dictate terms. During stage 1 it may still need to import uranium, which will put India again under the NSG scanner.

Nevertheless, India’s current uranium shortage has been addressed. Imports are the way to go until the fast breeder reactor technology is perfected.

--

(Hari Sud is a retired vice president of C-I-L Inc., a former investment strategies analyst and international relations manager. A graduate of Punjab University and the University of Missouri, he has lived in Canada for the past 34 years. ©Copyright Hari Sud.)



[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 22, 2009 12:41AM HKT
The fact about the India China War is that India wanted to bully China. Please read Neville Maxwell's book 'India's China War' and also check out this link: gregoryclark.net /redif.html

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 22, 2009 12:39AM HKT
The fact about the India China is that India wanted to bully China. Please read Neville Maxwell's book 'India's China War' and also check out this link: gregoryclark.net /redif.html

[ Flag ]
Kathleen @ October 20, 2009 12:23PM HKT
Gentlemen, Please remember that you are in a public forum where foul language and racial slurs are not acceptable. Due to reader complaints, some of your recent posts have been deleted. Intelligence and integrity are revealed through language; other readers are unimpressed with your personal insults and attacks.

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 20, 2009 11:03AM HKT

atimes.com /atimes/South_Asia/KJ20Df02.html

UN's caste declaration riles India

Oct 20, 2009 DELHI - The United Nations Human Rights Council's (UNHCR) recent decision to declare discrimination based on the caste system a "human-rights abuse" - thereby acknowledging centuries of bias against the world's estimated 200 million Dalits (untouchables) - has evoked a sharp reaction from India.

The UN decision came about despite robust opposition from the Indian government and its aggressive lobbying to get the council to delete the word "caste" from its draft. Instead, the UNHCR is now set to ratify draft principles that recognize persecution of Dalits worldwide.

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 20, 2009 11:01AM HKT
News reports of the ugly ruthless face of Hindu extremists:

youtube.com /watch?v=GVJwqza-iO4&feature=PlayList&p=2FEAC7BBC5772B59&index=34&playnext=2&playnext_from=PL 2

youtube.com /watch?v=iiuUsoIc00U&feature=PlayList&p=2FEAC7BBC5772B59&index=35

youtube.com /watch?v=y0FLW_OSKdA&feature=PlayList&p=2FEAC7BBC5772B59&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=37

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 19, 2009 10:12PM HKT
slope: here is some free education for you about your own country - over 800 million Indians (80.5%) are Hindu. Other religious groups include Muslims (13.4%), Christians (2.3%), Sikhs (1.9%), .... So even if the count was based on the 86.6% non-islamic population by increasing India's index by 13.4%, India only moved up to #101, still far away from China.

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 19, 2009 11:44AM HKT
slope wrote: "cuz you are brainless race"
slope is obviously a brainless pottymouth to say that. In the World Bank Knowledge Index, China is ranked #81 while India is way behind China at #109.
info.worldbank.org /etools/kam2/KAM_page5.asp
Because of brainless people like you, no wonder India is lagging so behind.

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 17, 2009 02:41AM HKT
slope, UK was already a democracy when it was still colonizing India. Also, India did not have the backbone to put up much of a fight against the British. The non-cooperation movement was definitely not enough to kick out the British. In contrast, China fought the Japanese invasion for 8 years until victory. BTW, China eats a lot of yummy cow beef, too, just like in many other countries.


[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 16, 2009 01:00PM HKT
slope, some free education for you again. Don't sound like as if India did not receive foreign aid.
newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7198546.stm
Gordon Brown has announced a new package of development aid for India, worth £825m over the next three years.

[ Flag ]
jimmy @ October 16, 2009 11:08AM HKT
@slope/Hari Sud: check out latest report on BBC News. India should think about how to solve its rapid growing hungry population, not on a quest for uranium. What a 21th-century embarrassment to India !

"Food Day Brazil and China have been praised, but India criticised

“China is also praised for cutting the number of hungry by 58 million in 10 years through strong state support for smallholder farmers.

But the report criticises economically liberal India where, it says, 30 million people have been added to the ranks of the hungry since the mid-1990s. ”

[ Flag ]
slope @ October 16, 2009 10:34AM HKT
jimmy boy! china has more bloody borders than India. china has been fighting with Japan, russia, phillipines, vietnam, India, Burma, Taiwan. china has illegally occupied tibet xinjiang (east turkistan)parts of burma, mongolia and India. EU and USA are already planning to contain arrogant china. china's future looks no different than the "soviet empire". India does not bully any country because it is a democratic country. name any democratic country which is at war with another democratic country.

[ Flag ]
slope @ October 16, 2009 10:25AM HKT
rightly said cooliehead! you sure are overnourished, sure country gets 7.5 billion dollars food aid from USA, weapons of mass destruction from mother of all terrorisms, "china" and extra spending cash from terrorism supporting all moslem countries. India, a proud nation would hate to live like Pakis (geroge bush). i am sure you are fat assed after all these free donations. However, I don't think your masters china men are well fed. their bone structure tells that are equally malnourished, worst, they will eat anything which moves including rats, dogs and your holy "pigs"

[ Flag ]
jimmy @ October 16, 2009 05:29AM HKT
To racist and cheap slope/Hari Sud:

What your question again? China never shy away for its painful history of late 19th to earlier 20th century. China after 1949 defends its own interests against US and USSR, punished smaller aggressors (you knew them), yet never engage any act of invading and rooting from weak nations.

On the other hand, India acts as a big bully to Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Burma ... and in 50s and 60s, even towards China.

[ Flag ]
slope @ October 16, 2009 02:22AM HKT
keep on harpin' you jimmy the slope head. china's glorious past is well known to the world, including the white man's domination for centuries. did the commies change the real history of china too?

[ Flag ]
jimmy @ October 16, 2009 01:44AM HKT
Indian still like to do what they like to do the best: obsession about their inherited “colonial glory”, bullying weak neighbors, play dogs to world ’super’ powers.

Chinese are all serious about their territory claim, yet trying to be reasonable to create a win-win situation.

[ Flag ]
jimmy @ October 15, 2009 08:44AM HKT
slope: Indians can sure be proud of its colonial era, corrupted and bureaucratic "democratic" system

[ Flag ]
jimmy @ October 15, 2009 08:42AM HKT
slope: read this NYT article that will definitively improve your understanding ...

"Eight Ideas Behind China’s Success
By ZHANG WEI-WE

1. Seeking truth from facts.
2. Primacy of people’s livelihood.
3. The importance of holistic thinking.
4. Government as a necessary virtue.
5. Good governance matters more than democratization.
6. Performance legitimacy.
7. Selective learning and adaptation.
8. Harmony in diversity."

do a google search with term "NYT ZHANG WEI-WE"

[ Flag ]
jimmy @ October 15, 2009 07:21AM HKT
"slope: India is a land full of energetic people with lotta hopes " blah blah blah.

So many Indians impressed me by their bragging and selling empty air such as their "energetic hopes" or "by 2035 growth rate" etc. LoL. What about today's and tomorrow's problems in India and world. Are India full of these type 'smoking high' dreamer and hope selling agents?

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 14, 2009 11:42AM HKT
Russia gives to India? You mean the Soviet-era junk Admiral Gorshkov at USD 2.9 billion and still going up? Certainly China can't even imagine such a ridiculous deal.
Too much nasty angry rhetoric, too little facts. Then from Jatt's NYTimes article, I found out why - slope the slumdog boy must have been malnourished according to this:
(nytimes.com /2009/10/11/magazine/11FOB-Rieff-t.html?_r=1)
"The science is disturbingly clear: if you are malnourished until age 3, your neural formation suffers, and most of that underdevelopment is fixed for life."
Biraj Patnaik, a principal architect of the Right to Food campaign, is intransigent on the topic: “My question is if the government can spend 25 billion U.S. dollars on defense, why can’t it spend an equivalent amount on ensuring the food security of the people of India?” "For many Indians, the Chinese example provides a counterpoint and possibly even a model."
Disclaimer: I am just quoting NYTimes, don't get nasty again, boy...oh, there you go again...

[ Flag ]
slope @ October 14, 2009 02:32AM HKT
Hey Jatt, India is a land full of energetic people with lotta hopes unlike your pakiland. The nation is on the rise and nothing will stop it. on the contrary, our neighbor to the northwest is a land of jihadis with no hopes but beggin' bowls. India will shine and china will stay jealous for ever. this is something India shall never forget. pakistan is nothing more than china's monkey wrench thrown in to India's progress path.
eat your heart out
America and the west both are propping India to a prosperous nation, where as russia gives India what china can only dream about.

[ Flag ]
Jatt @ October 13, 2009 09:10PM HKT
India should give up it quest and concentrate states energy elsewhere

"Today only 7 percent of Chinese children under age 5 are underweight, whereas the figure for India is 43 percent. Even in sub-Saharan Africa, which most people assume to have the direst poverty statistics, the average child-malnutrition rate is 28 percent."

NYTimes Oct 2009


[ Flag ]
HariSud @ October 12, 2009 10:16PM HKT

Coolhead

Stay on the subject and then only blog.

If somebody offends you, ignore it.

British have still some people left who loved imperial Raj and wish return of that. Some of them have returned eaasays of return of British imperilaism not only to India but also to the 13 colonies in US. They are not worth your time, unless you are one of them.

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 12, 2009 10:41AM HKT
HariSud, I was not pretending ... I was just quoting the British correspondent Peter Foster's blog. See the link above "As a former..."? (blogs.telegraph.co.uk /news/peterfoster/9507086/China_v_India_two_kinds_of_people_power_/) I was just responding to slope.

[ Flag ]
HariSud @ October 12, 2009 05:00AM HKT


Either stay on the subject or get out of this thread. You have wasted enough of the reader's time.

I am saying the above specific to "coolhead".

You pretend you were a correspondent in India. You do not display any quality of that.


[ Flag ]
HumanRights @ October 11, 2009 07:34PM HKT
How can India be democractic when politicians are using violence, corruption and intimidation to remain in power?

Political violence and corruption are at alarming levels in India.

India must get rid of caste system, religious madness, hate, Brahmins domination and introduce a fair and just recognition of talent and contribution to the society.

The worst thing of Indian politics is the "Dynasty".

Can't the Indians find a true leader than Italian Sonia from the 1 billion population?

Indian politics has become a disgraceful family politics of Nehru-Indra-Rajiv-Sonia-Rahul- may be Priyanka later. Is this democratic? This is why India is not progressing and still a mockery regime of the 21st Century!


[ Flag ]
HumanRights @ October 11, 2009 07:20PM HKT
India is the worst human rights abuser in South East Asia after Sri Lanka.

Criminally convicted politicians are in Indian parliament. India is a slumdog and is full of unspeakble crimes, hate, caste, mockery and political violence. Is this a democracy to the criminals?

I am confident that there would have be extensive election fraud in India.

Indians may take another 3000 years to be civilized. India is committing war crimes in Kashmir. India has committed war crimes in Sri Lanka. India has nothing to boast about human rights after they made history by voting against UN Human Rights investigation in Sri Lanka.

Tamils should have supported the Chinese and not the Indians. Tamils have failed to understand that Indians cannot be trusted.

[ Flag ]
DM @ October 11, 2009 04:27PM HKT
chinese need to qualify first to debate with India... become a democratic country and give real power to the common chinese .... democracy is inevitable in china... comon coolhead demonstrate for democracy in your country !!! hip hip hurray...and good luck!

[ Flag ]
Coolhead @ October 11, 2009 05:30AM HKT

slope: don't miss school tomorrow. For now, I can teach you a few things that your school won't teach. India illegally occupies south Tibet (aka Arunachal Pradesh in India), Kashmir and Sikkim. The evil caste/class system in India is a brutal human right violation. Also India is more corrupt than China, read these:

rediff.com /money/2008/sep/24graft.htm

India has slipped further in the global corruption perception index released annually by corruption watchdog Transparency International.
China, on its part, has led a group of nations which have marched ahead of India with an improved image, according to the latest survey by TI.

blogs.telegraph.co.uk /news/peterfoster/9507086/China_v_India_two_kinds_of_people_power_/

As a former correspondent in New Delhi, I also must confess to finding myself constantly amazed by the responsiveness of China’s rulers when compared to India’s who, in my experience, were spectacularly unconcerned about the well-being of ordinary people... The effect on India’s development can be seen in the comparative numbers on health, education, infrastructure development etc. The hard truth is that China has done more for its people than India these past 30 years.


[ Flag ]
slope @ October 10, 2009 05:57AM HKT
Jimmy dude! Indians do not hate the Chinese people but the commie government of China. Reagan often called soviet union an evil empire. China fits that description perfectly. illegal occupation of Tibet, Xinjiang, part of Mongolia, proliferation of nukes and missiles to rogue countries, territorial dispute with all neighboring countries. you know what happened to evil empire and what will happen again to "evil empire"? Democracy will win and death to the remnants of communism and dictatorship.








Supreme Court in Dhaka. (Photo/Vipez)
Bangladesh: Justice delayed and denied
William Gomes

Dhaka , Bangladesh



Cycling Home from Siberia
by Rob Lilwall

Reviewed by Bill Purves



Copyright © 2007-2010 United Press International, Inc.